Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristina Bella

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:05, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cristina Bella

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, industry PR materials, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:NACTOR. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre. The category listed "Nifta Award winner – Best European Starlet" is not significant. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Nat965 (talk) 09:04, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Nat965 (talk) 09:04, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Clearly failed in WP:PORNBIO.Guilherme Burn (talk) 12:06, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as No evidence of notability, hasnt won any notable/significent awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG –Davey2010^Talk 22:13, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete total failure of the abysmally low hurdle of the pornographic film performer biography standards.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:41, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
this sounds insulting to the actress and genre and to wikipedia and unworthy of an impartial moderator. 2600:1700:D00:75B0:BDEA:1114:40DB:39EE (talk) 07:06, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.